Current:Home > MyArkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure -Mastery Money Tools
Arkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure
View
Date:2025-04-27 19:40:14
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The Arkansas Supreme Court upheld the state’s rejection of signature petitions for an abortion rights ballot initiative on Thursday, keeping the proposal from going before voters in November.
The ruling dashed the hopes of organizers, who submitted the petitions, of getting the constitutional amendment measure on the ballot in the predominantly Republican state, where many top leaders tout their opposition to abortion.
Election officials said Arkansans for Limited Government, the group behind the measure, did not properly submit documentation regarding the signature gatherers it hired. The group disputed that assertion and argued it should have been given more time to provide any additional documents needed.
“We find that the Secretary correctly refused to count the signatures collected by paid canvassers because the sponsor failed to file the paid canvasser training certification,” the court said in a 4-3 ruling.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision removing the nationwide right to abortion, there has been a push to have voters decide the matter state by state.
Arkansas currently bans abortion at any time during a pregnancy, unless the woman’s life is endangered due to a medical emergency.
The proposed amendment would have prohibited laws banning abortion in the first 20 weeks of gestation and allowed the procedure later on in cases of rape, incest, threats to the woman’s health or life, or if the fetus would be unlikely to survive birth. It would not have created a constitutional right to abortion.
The ballot proposal lacked support from national abortion rights groups such as Planned Parenthood because it would still have allowed abortion to be banned after 20 weeks, which is earlier than other states where it remains legal.
Had they all been verified, the more than 101,000 signatures, submitted on the state’s July 5 deadline, would have been enough to qualify for the ballot. The threshold was 90,704 signatures from registered voters, and from a minimum of 50 counties.
In a earlier filing with the court, election officials said that 87,675 of the signatures submitted were collected by volunteers with the campaign. Election officials said it could not determine whether 912 of the signatures came from volunteer or paid canvassers.
Arkansans for Limited Government and election officials disagreed over whether the petitions complied with a 2013 state law requiring campaigns to submit statements identifying each paid canvasser by name and confirming that rules for gathering signatures were explained to them.
Supporters of the measure said they followed the law with their documentation, including affidavits identifying each paid gatherer. They have also argued the abortion petitions are being handled differently than other initiative campaigns this year, pointing to similar filings by two other groups.
State records show that the abortion campaign did submit, on June 27, a signed affidavit including a list of paid canvassers and a statement saying the petition rules had been explained to them. Moreover, the July 5 submission included affidavits from each paid worker acknowledging that the group provided them with all the rules and regulations required by law.
The state argued in court that this documentation did not comply because it was not signed by someone with the canvassing company rather than the initiative campaign itself. The state said the statement also needed to be submitted alongside the petitions.
veryGood! (45361)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- Jason Kelce Has Most Supportive Reaction to Taylor Swift Arriving at Travis Kelce's NFL Game
- Courts keep weighing in on abortion. Next month’s elections could mean even bigger changes
- Powerball winning numbers for October 7: Jackpot rises to $315 million
- Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
- October Prime Day 2024: Get the Viral COSRX Snail Mucin for Under $12 & Save Big on More COSRX Must-Haves
- An unusual hurricane season goes from ultra quiet to record busy and spawns Helene and Milton
- A series of deaths and the ‘Big Fight': Uncovering police force in one Midwestern city
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- These police officers had red flags in their past, then used force in a case that ended in death
Ranking
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Scarlett Johansson Shares Skincare Secrets, Beauty Regrets & What She's Buying for Prime Day 2024
- From Snapchat to YouTube, here's how to monitor and protect your kids online
- Is Your Company Losing Money Due to Climate Change? Consider Moving to the Midwest, Survey Says
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- Flaming Lips member Steven Drozd's teen daughter goes missing: 'Please help if you can'
- 3 crew members killed in Kentucky medical helicopter crash were headed to pick up a patient
- Man injured after explosion at Southern California home; blast cause unknown
Recommendation
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Takeaways from AP’s investigation into fatal police incidents in one Midwestern city
Christina Hall’s Ex Josh Hall Slams “False” Claim He Stole From Her Amid Divorce
Michigan university president’s home painted with anti-Israel messages
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
How Tucson police handled a death like George Floyd’s when leaders thought it would never happen
Bought Pyrex glass measuring cups? You may be getting a refund from the FTC.
Jurors weigh how to punish a former Houston officer whose lies led to murder during a drug raid